|
News
Patterson Ranch development concerns
By Mary Biggs - Letter to the Editor
Tri-City Voice, December 16, 2009
[Edited letter to Scott Ruhland, City of Fremont Planning Division]
I am
asking three questions directly related to the
[Patterson Ranch] DEIR.
Question #1 - Soil contamination cleanup
If Council approves the Plan as is, will FFD or City of
Fremont notify North Fremont residents of the exact
dates of the "proposed" contaminated soils cleanup in
the project area?
DEIR states FFD will approve 'a Site-Specific Health and
Safety Plan for construction workers who will face
'potential exposure to toxic materials.'(DEIR 4.8-12)
Will FFD approve any construction phase safety plans for
the general public residing immediately adjacent to the
planned development?
Could particles of dieldrin and toxaphene become
airborne during the soil cleanup phase?
DEIR 4.8-11 & 12 mention the 'treatment and / or
removal' of toxic and contaminated soils. DEIR 4.8-11
vaguely describes the 'offsite disposal' of contaminated
soils to a 'nearby development parcel' and also mentions
'excavation and placement' of contaminated soils in
'open space areas with a vegetative cover or soil cap.'
What soils will be 'treated;' what soils will be
'removed;' and where is this 'open space' or 'nearby
development parcel' where contaminated soils will be
placed?
Question #2 - State Law Requirements Regarding City Park
Acreage
What are the exact city park acreage requirements
specified by CA State Law? Is the exact wording of the
law a 'total park acreage per total' city square miles?
Or does the wording of the law specify a certain park
acreage requirement per population density per each city
square mile?
Question #3 - Swap Current City Park Space for Proposed
School Space at Site 4:
Is the following a feasible alternative to building an
elementary school on the 10 acres at Site 4? (DEIR 3-6,
Table 3-1)
If Council votes to approve the Patterson Ranch Plan as
is, instead of using developer monies (DEIR 4.15-3) to
build one elementary school at Site 4, FUSD could use
developer monies to expand existing North Fremont
schools?
Use the 10 school acres at Site 4 as additional City
Park lands, to make up for existing City Park lands that
the City would give to FUSD for North Fremont school
expansions. Specifically, City of Fremont would give
FUSD reasonable and appropriate portions of existing
City Park lands currently adjacent to Ardenwood
Elementary on Deep Creek Rd., to Forest Park Elementary
on Maybird Circle, and American High & Brookvale
Elementary on Alder and Nicolet (Los Cerritos Park).
Basically let's create an even swap of current North
Fremont City Park acreage for the designated 10 school
acres at Site 4.
CA Dept. of Education, Title 5, California Code of
Regulations, Article 2. Standards for School Site
Selection, Item I, states that "all school districts
shall select school sites that provide safety and
support learning. The following standard(s) shall apply:
Item I: The site is not subject to moderate to high
liquefaction or landslides." http://www.cde.ca.gov/LS/fa/sf/title5regs.asp
The DEIR only includes descriptions of Modified Mercalli
Intensity Ratings of VII and VIII; it should also
include the detailed descriptions of Modified Mercalli
Intensity Ratings of IX and X,
The discussed $ 9 million in developer monies is
inadequate for all North Fremont school expansion costs,
but at least it's partial funding. It is also an
inadequate amount to build one elementary school
specially engineered for liquefaction soil and
significant seismic activity.
If expanding current North Fremont schools to
accommodate new students from the proposed development
is not a viable alternative, then I implore you to work
with City Staff and FUSD to come up with other
alternatives than building an elementary school at Site
4.
I strongly oppose the building of an elementary school
at Site 4. Please encourage the City Council and
Planning Commission to make safety their top priority.
Mary Biggs
Warwick Elementary School Safety Committee
Fremont Fire Dept. CERT volunteer, since 1996 |